Services
Engagements are organised around four pillars covering the full EU regulatory cycle — from intelligence and foresight, through advocacy and impact assessment, to research and policy studies. Each pillar draws on the same underlying integration of law, institutional analysis and quantitative method.
I.
Structured reading of the European regulatory environment, designed to surface direction before it becomes consensus.
II.
Evidence-based engagement with the institutions, grounded in substantive contribution rather than mere access.
III.
Qualitative and quantitative assessment of regulatory options, using methods aligned with Commission and OECD practice.
IV.
Independent studies combining academic rigour with practical decision support for clients and policy audiences.
Note on method
Impact assessment and econometric modelling are used to sharpen, not to substitute, the interpretation of a file. Numerical estimates are always framed against their assumptions, the state of the underlying data, and the political constraints that will govern how they are received in the institutions.
Conversely, legal and institutional analysis is treated as amenable to structured evidence. Where a claim can be tested — on trade flows, administrative burden, distributive effects or compliance costs — it is tested, and the residual uncertainty is stated plainly.
First conversations are exploratory and without obligation.
