About

A practitioner-scholar reading of European regulation.

Nexum EU Strategies is built around a rare combination: the drafting experience of a regulatory practitioner, the analytical training of a legal and policy scholar, and the methodological discipline of applied quantitative research.

Corrado Finardi, PhD — Founder of Nexum EU Strategies

Founder

Corrado Finardi, PhD

Regulatory strategist · Legal and policy analyst · Applied econometrician

Download selected publications (PDF)

Corrado Finardi has worked in leading and directorial roles for more than two decades within the European regulatory ecosystem — across the European Commission - EFSA environments, EU-level trade and sectoral associations, national institutions, and cooperation with academic and research centres. His experience spans agricultural policy, food law, plant protection and agri-input, animal feed, trade policy and the wider architecture of EU regulatory governance.

His practice integrates legal interpretation, institutional analysis, political science, applied econometrics, public policy and regulatory economics. This combination allows a single professional to move, within the same file, from the drafting of a legal provision to the estimation of its trade or welfare effects, and from procedural positioning inside the institutions to the political economy of the actors surrounding them.

While Corrado Finardi leads Nexum's strategic direction and client relationships, the practice draws on a wider circle of senior consultants, subject-matter specialists and researchers who contribute to specific engagements — in law, econometrics, political science and regulatory science. This allows Nexum to scale expertise to the demands of each mandate while preserving a single point of accountability.

Alongside advisory work, he maintains an active academic publishing record in peer-reviewed journals and edited volumes, and contributes to policy-oriented research on European regulatory systems. For multidisciplinary projects, Nexum assembles ad-hoc, project-specific teams from first-level research centres, universities and specialised experts — shaped around the exact scope and needs of the client.

Portfolio

Brand-facing regulatory strategy.

Along his career, as consultant in food, feed, supplements, food additive and colors, and nutrition regulatory frameworks, he advised leading food brands, SMEs and start-ups on market-facing regulatory strategy, and more broadly, in the product development phase, in strict cooperation with legal, marketing, R&D, quality departments. This includes several innovative products across traditional and novel food frameworks, as currently sold in many supermarkets today.

This work built solid operational expertise across the regulatory domains that shape food and nutrition products:

  • Food Information to Consumers
  • General Food Law
  • Official Controls and due diligence
  • GMOs and derived products
  • Novel Foods and proprietary dossiers
  • Food additives and flavourings
  • Health claims at the EFSA–industry interface

Method

Interpretation, not monitoring.

The objective of the practice is not to catalogue regulatory developments, but to interpret their trajectory and implications. Qualitative institutional analysis is combined with quantitative methods — impact assessment, econometric estimation, scenario and counterfactual analysis — to enable organisations to anticipate change and act with clarity, foresight and confidence.

The intended output is neither a monitoring bulletin nor a promotional deck, but a considered reading of the regulatory situation, written to a standard usable by senior decision-makers, legal counsel and technical teams alike.

Current research interests

Where the practice meets the literature.

  • Regulatory simplification and Better Regulation
  • Legislative design and quality of law
  • Maximum Residue Levels and food-safety governance
  • Impact assessment methodologies
  • Administrative capacity in EU institutions
  • Distributed and multi-level governance
  • Regulatory delays and implementation gaps
  • Evidence-based policymaking
  • Comparative regulatory systems
  • Political economy of European decision-making